Functional Local Government Autonomy in Nigeria: Thesis for a Community Participation Model
Aderogba, Ademola Asimiyu , and Arafat Opeyemi Aderogba
Senior Lecturer, Department of General Studies, Lagos State University of Science and Technology, Ikorodu, Nigeria.
Ph.D. Student, Department of Political Science, Lagos State University, Ojo, Nigeria
The paper focuses on how local government autonomy can be effective and efficient. Recent research findings indicate that local governments in Nigeria are not productive, not efficient and not effective because of lack of autonomy, be it financial, administrative or political autonomy. Hence, there is a need to examine the deficiencies in the operation of local governments, and come up with a process model that can enhance functional local government autonomy. Therefore, relying on Descriptive Analysis method and Democratic Participation theoretical framework, the study examines how community participation in governance can be an impetus to achieve the objectives of autonomy, and proposes a Community Participation Model, as a way to strengthen an autonomous local government performance, otherwise, full autonomy will achieve nothing with the present state of local governments in Nigeria. The model further illustrates how the Community Development Associations can participate in governance to ensure that the planning, implementation, and evaluation represent the grassroots felt-need. The study recommends the following to actualise the functionality of the model: constitutional reforms to restore local government autonomy, enabling laws mandating the creation of Community Development Associations in all parts of Nigeria; and the States governments granting special fund to strengthen the operation of the Community Development Associations.
Keywords: Autonomy, Community Development Association, Community Participation, Local
Cite This Article
APA 7th Style
Aderogba, A. A., & Aderogba, A. O. (2023). Functional Local Government Autonomy in Nigeria: Thesis for a Community Participation Model. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 02(02), 300–318. https://doi.org/10.59231/SARI7588
MLA 9th Edition
Aderogba, Ademola Asimiyu, and Arafat Opeyemi Aderogba. “Functional Local Government Autonomy in Nigeria: Thesis for a Community Participation Model.” Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 02, no. 02, Apr. 2023, pp. 300–18. https://doi.org/10.59231/SARI7588.
Aderogba, Ademola Asimiyu, and Arafat Opeyemi Aderogba. “Functional Local Government Autonomy in Nigeria: Thesis for a Community Participation Model.” Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal 02, no. 02 (April 20, 2023): 300–318. https://doi.org/10.59231/SARI7588.
Elections into the center or federal offices have become do or die affairs in Nigeria because of the concentration of power at the center. The sub national governments at the local level are weak and near irrelevant, hence, the desperation of the political actors at the center. Thus, the focus on autonomy is to strengthen the sub national governments at the local level in Nigeria. According to the report of UNDP, United Nations (UN) Human Development Index 2021, Nigeria ranked 163rd for the second consecutive year, with HDI score of 0.535. Hence, focus must be on strengthening grassroots development through the local government that is closer to the people. Proposing a model that can address the peculiarities of Nigeria challenges at local level will be impactful.
About The Author
Dr Ademola Aderogba holds Ph.D in Public Administration, with research interest in public policy, local government, and rural development. He has authored and co-authored publications in both national and international journals. He is a Senior Lecturer, and presently the Dean of students affairs, at the Lagos state university of science and technology; formerly Lagos state polytechnic where he was a Chief lecturer and the Director of the Center for Entrepreneurship before the transmutation.
2. Miss Arafat Aderogba holds Msc in Political science and Bsc in International relations and presently a Ph.D student with research interest in peace building, gender studies, and sustainable development.
1. Adedire, S.A. (2014). Local Government and the Challenges of Rural Development in Nigeria (1999 to date). IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 19(4), 21-32.
2. Adelesi, F. (2015). The Role of Community Development Associations in a Democratic Rule. A text delivered at the 2014 Seminar of Ikorodu North Community Development Committee on 27th November, 2014.https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/role-community-development-associations-democratic-rule-adelesi
3. Ahmad, A. (2013). Local Government Autonomy and its Effectiveness in Nigeria. The Journal of African & Asian Local Government Studies, 2(1): 48-59.
4. Akinsorotan, A. & Olujide, M. (2006). Community Development Associations’ Contributions in Self Help Projects in Lagos State of Nigeria. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 7(4), 609- 618
5. Akpan, F. & Ekanem, O. (2013). The Politics of Local Government Autonomy in Nigeria Reloaded. European Scientific Journal, 9(35), 193-205, ISSN: 1857 – 7881.
6. Amah, E. I. (2018). Devolution of Power to Local Government: Appraising Local Government Autonomy under Nigerian Federation. Beijing Law Review, 9, 275-293.
7. Amakihe, B.,Ako, I. &Fasanu, G. (2017). Citizen Participation and Local Government Responsiveness: A Comparative Analysis of Nigeria and United States of America. International Journal of Progressive and Alternative Education, 4(1): 1-19, ISSN: 2408 – 6452
8. Ananti, M.O., Onyekwelu, R.U. & Madubueze, M.C. (2015). Caretaker committee system: 2003-2014 in Anambra State. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: Administration and Management, 15(1), 32-38.
9. Anaychukwu, G.I.,Ani, V.A. & Nsah, B. (2022). Assessment of Local Government Autonomy and Governance: A Case Study in Nigeria. Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies, 2(1): 15-28
10. Aragones, E. & Sanchez-Pagez, S. (2009). A Theory of Participatory Democracy Based on the Real Case of Porto Alegre. European Economic Review, 53(1), 56-72.
11. Avis, W.R. (2016). Urban Governance (Topic Guide). Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham.
12. Brian, C. & Hansen, P. (2019). Towards a Critical Theory of Democracy: Participatory Democracy and Social Freedom. In Critical Theory, Democracy. And the Challenge of Neoliberalism. University of Toronto Press. pp. 232-281. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/j.ctvnp0hk9.10
13. Bryon, J.M; Quick, K; Slotterback, C. & Crosby, B. (2013). Designing Public Participation Processes. Public Administration Review, 73(1): 23-34.
14. Busari-Akinbode, A. & Temilola, M. (2020). Effectiveness of Community Development Associations (CDAs) in Implementing Development Projects in Surulere, Lagos State. African Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 3(6), 157-166.
15. Crozier, M., Huntington, S.& Watanuki, J. (1975). The Crisis of Democracy. New York, New York University Press
16. Edih, U. (2020). Communal Participation and Good Governance in Nigeria. International Journal of International Relations, Media and Mass Communication Studies, 6(1): 35-56, ISSN: 2059-1853
17. Fatile, J.O. & Adejuwon, K.D. (2017). Intergovernmental Financial Transfer and Socio-Economic Development at the Grassroots Level: An Empirical Study of Selected Local Governments in Lagos State, Nigeria. International Journal of Advanced Studies in Business Strategies and Management, 5(2): 61-77.
18. Geissel, B. (2009). Participatory Governance: Hope or Danger for Democracy? A Case Study of Local Agenda 21. Local Government Studies, 35(4), 401-414.
19. Gittell, J.H. (2001). Supervisory Span, Relational Coordination and Flight Departure Performance: A Reassessment of Postbureaucracy Theory, Organization Science, 12(4): 468-483, DOI: 10.1287/orsc.12.4.468.10636.
20. Hilmer, J.D. (2010). The State of Participatory Democratic Theory. New Political Science, 32(1), 43-63.
21. Inglehart, R. (1977). The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
22. Irvin, R. &Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), pp. 55–65.
23. Jiman, C.&Foziah, B. (2016).Public Participation Efficiency in Traditional Cities of Developing Countries: A Perspective of Urban Development in Bida, Nigeria. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, (219): 185 – 192
24. Keutgen, J. (2021, June 8). Participatory Democracy: The Importance of Having a Say When Times are Hard. An Interview with Institut Montaigne, Paris, France. https://www.institutmontaigne.org/en/analysis/participatory-democracy-importance-having-say-when-times-are-hard
25. Local Government Support Programme (2008, August). Citizen Engagement and Participatory Governance: Challenges and Opportunities to Improve Public Services at the Local Level. Good Governance Brief. Sudirman, Indonesia.
26. Lupien, D. (2022). Participatory Democracy, Democratic Education, and Women. Journal of Latin American Studies, 54(4), 617-645. doi: 10.1017/S0022216X22000517
27. Makinde, J.T., Hassan, A.O. & Taiwo, A.O. (2016). Theory, Principle and Practice of Local Governance in Nigeria. The Journal of Developing Areas, 50(1), 305-318. http;//www.jstor.org/stable/24737350
28. Mansuri, G. & Rao, V. (2013). Localizing Development: Does Participation Work?. Washington, DC: World Bank.
29. Michels, A. (2011). Innovations in Democratic Governance: How Does Citizen Participation Contribute to a Better Democracy?. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2): 275-293.
30. Moriyole, A. &Adesopo, A. (2015). Citizen’s Participation in Policy Making at the Local Government in South Western Nigeria. Academic Research International, 6(2): 242-252.
31. Muazu, A.S; Ibrahim, D; Kabir, U. & Haruna, M. (2017). The 1999 Constitution and the Roles of Local Governments in Nigeria: Hitches and the Way Forward. International Journal of Innovative Legal & Political Studies, 5(2): 1-10, ISSN: 2354-2926.
32. Offe, C. (2011) Crisis and Innovation in Liberal Democracy: Can Deliberation Be Institutionalized? Czech Sociological Review, 47(3), pp. 447–472
33. Oikhala, G. & Tobi, A. (2021). Local Government Reforms and Grassroots Development in Nigeria. Journal of Administrative Science, 18(1), 113 – 133.
34. Okali, C., Sumberg, J., Farrington, J. (1994). Farmer Participatory Research: Rhetoric and Reality. Intermediate Technology Publications: London.
35. Okoh, C.C., Onwe, S.O., &Ofoma, C.V. (2022). Local Government Financial Autonomy and Rural Development in Enugu State. Canadian Social Science, 18(5): 16-26.
36. Olivia (2022, September 23). Participatory Governance: Advantages and Disadvantages. GroundWaterGovernance. https://www.groundwatergovernance.org/participatory-governance-advantages-and-disadvantages/
37. Osakede, K.O., Ijimakinwa, S.O. & Adesanya, T.O. (2016). Local Government Financial Autonomy in Nigeria: An Empirical Analysis. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 5(11), 24-37.
38. Quick, K.S. & Bryson, J. (2016). Theories of Public Participation in Governance. In: Torbing, J. & Ansell C. (eds) Handbook in Theories of Governance, Edward Elgar Press.